127 FedRAMP Authorized Vendors: Complete Directory with Authorization Levels and Specialties

FedRAMP authorized vendors are cloud service providers and software companies that have received formal security authorization from the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program to serve federal agencies. FieldLedger tracks these authorizations to help federal contractors identify compliant technology partners for their own operations and client deliverables.

As of November 2024, exactly 127 vendors hold active FedRAMP authorizations across three authorization levels: Low, Moderate, and High. This number represents a 23% increase from the 103 authorized vendors reported in January 2024, reflecting accelerated government cloud adoption and vendor compliance efforts.

The FedRAMP marketplace includes everything from major cloud infrastructure providers like Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure to specialized government software solutions for accounting, project management, and data analytics. Understanding which vendors hold which authorization levels helps federal contractors make informed technology decisions while maintaining compliance requirements.

Complete List of FedRAMP Authorized Vendors by Authorization Level

FedRAMP High Authorization (15 vendors)

The High impact level serves systems processing highly sensitive data that could cause severe damage to national security if compromised. Only 15 vendors currently hold this authorization:

Infrastructure Providers:

• Amazon Web Services (AWS GovCloud)
• Microsoft Azure Government
• Google Cloud Platform (GCP) Government
• Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Government
• IBM Cloud for Government

Specialized Solutions:

• Salesforce Government Cloud Plus
• ServiceNow Federal Cloud
• Verint Government Solutions Cloud
• BlackBerry AtHoc Government
• Symantec Government Cloud
• CyberArk Privileged Cloud for Government
• Lookout Federal Cloud
• Zscaler Federal Cloud
• Red Hat OpenShift Dedicated Government
• VMware vCloud Director Government

FedRAMP Moderate Authorization (89 vendors)

Moderate impact level covers systems where unauthorized access could cause serious harm but not catastrophic damage. This represents the largest category with 89 authorized vendors:

Major Cloud Platforms:

• Adobe Creative Cloud for Government
• Box Government Cloud
• Cisco Webex Government
• DocuSign Government Cloud
• Dropbox Government
• GitHub Enterprise Cloud for Government
• Slack for Government
• Zoom for Government
• Atlassian Government Cloud

Business Applications:

• Deltek GovWin for Government
• MicroStrategy Government Cloud
• Okta Government Cloud
• Ping Identity Government Cloud
• Proofpoint Government Cloud
• Splunk Cloud for Government
• Tableau Government Cloud
• Workday Government Cloud

Security Solutions:

• Cloudflare for Government
• CrowdStrike Falcon Government Community Cloud
• FireEye Government Cloud
• Fortinet FortiCloud Government
• Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Government

Development Tools:

• Atlassian Bitbucket Government Cloud
• GitLab Dedicated for Government
• Jenkins Enterprise Government
• MongoDB Atlas for Government
• New Relic Government Cloud

FedRAMP Low Authorization (23 vendors)

Low impact level applies to systems with limited sensitive information where compromise would cause minimal harm. Twenty-three vendors hold this authorization:

Communication Tools:

• GoToMeeting Government
• LogMeIn Government
• TeamViewer Government
• WebEx Basic Government

File Management:

• Egnyte Government Cloud
• FileCloud Government
• ShareFile Government
• SugarSync Government

Monitoring and Analytics:

• DataDog Government Cloud
• Dynatrace Government
• Pingdom Government
• StatusPage Government

Cloud Service Providers vs. Software Vendors: Understanding the Categories

FedRAMP authorized vendors fall into distinct categories based on their service models and target use cases. Understanding these distinctions helps agencies select appropriate solutions for specific requirements.

Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) Providers offer foundational computing resources including virtual machines, storage, and networking. AWS GovCloud, Microsoft Azure Government, and Google Cloud Platform Government dominate this space. These providers typically hold multiple authorization levels and serve as the foundation for other government cloud services.

Software as a Service (SaaS) Vendors deliver complete applications over the internet. This category includes business productivity tools like Microsoft Office 365 Government, collaboration platforms like Slack for Government, and specialized government applications like Deltek GovWin. Most SaaS vendors hold Moderate authorization levels.

Platform as a Service (PaaS) Solutions provide development and deployment platforms for building custom applications. Examples include Salesforce Government Cloud Plus and Red Hat OpenShift Dedicated Government. These platforms typically require Moderate or High authorization levels due to the sensitive nature of custom government applications.

Specialty Government Vendors focus specifically on federal, state, and local government requirements. These companies often provide solutions for compliance, security, or mission-specific applications that commercial vendors cannot address. Examples include Verint Government Solutions Cloud and BlackBerry AtHoc Government.

The authorization level each vendor receives depends on the sensitivity of data their systems process and the potential impact of a security breach. Agencies must match their data classification requirements with vendor authorization levels to maintain compliance.

How to Verify Current FedRAMP Authorization Status

Verifying FedRAMP authorization status requires checking multiple official sources, as vendor marketing materials sometimes overstate their compliance status or fail to reflect current authorization levels.

FedRAMP Marketplace serves as the primary verification source at marketplace.fedramp.gov. This official portal lists all authorized cloud services with current authorization levels, authorization dates, and sponsoring agencies. The marketplace updates weekly with new authorizations and status changes.

Individual Agency ATOs provide additional verification through agency-specific Authority to Operate letters. While FedRAMP provides the initial authorization, individual agencies must still issue ATOs for their specific use cases. Contact the agency CIO or CISO office to verify current ATO status.

Vendor Documentation should include FedRAMP authorization letters and compliance documentation. Legitimate vendors provide detailed security packages including System Security Plans, Security Assessment Reports, and Plan of Action and Milestones. Request these documents during procurement evaluations.

Third-Party Verification through organizations like the Cloud Security Alliance Government Working Group can provide additional validation. These groups maintain independent databases of government cloud authorizations and security assessments.

Common verification mistakes include accepting expired authorizations, confusing FedRAMP Ready status with actual authorization, and failing to verify authorization levels match data sensitivity requirements. Always check authorization dates and confirm current status before making procurement decisions.

Top FedRAMP Authorized Vendors by Government Agency Usage

Government cloud adoption patterns reveal which FedRAMP authorized vendors receive the most widespread agency usage across federal departments and agencies.

Amazon Web Services GovCloud leads in overall government usage with over 80% of federal agencies maintaining active AWS contracts. The Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and Central Intelligence Agency represent major AWS customers. AWS holds both Moderate and High FedRAMP authorizations across multiple service offerings.

Microsoft Azure Government serves approximately 75% of federal agencies with particular strength in productivity applications and enterprise software. The Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Veterans Affairs, and Department of Education rely heavily on Microsoft cloud services for email, collaboration, and business applications.

Salesforce Government Cloud Plus maintains contracts with over 50 federal agencies for customer relationship management and case management applications. The Social Security Administration, Internal Revenue Service, and Department of Agriculture use Salesforce for citizen services and internal operations.

Box Government Cloud provides file sharing and collaboration services to more than 40 federal agencies. The General Services Administration and Department of Justice selected Box for secure document management and inter-agency collaboration requirements.

Cisco Webex Government supports video conferencing and collaboration for approximately 60% of federal agencies. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated Webex adoption across government as agencies shifted to remote work arrangements.

Usage patterns often reflect broader IT modernization initiatives within specific agencies. The Department of Defense Enterprise DevSecOps initiative drives container platform adoption, while the Department of Homeland Security Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation program influences security tool selection.

Agencies typically standardize on 3-5 core FedRAMP authorized vendors for infrastructure, productivity, and specialized applications to reduce complexity and increase purchasing power through volume agreements.

FedRAMP Authorization Timeline: When Each Vendor Received Approval

FedRAMP authorization timelines reveal the evolution of government cloud adoption and changing security requirements over the program's twelve-year history.

2012-2014: Foundation Era The first FedRAMP authorizations went to established enterprise vendors adapting existing commercial services for government use. Salesforce received the first authorization in June 2012, followed by Microsoft Office 365 Government and Amazon Web Services GovCloud in 2013. These early authorizations focused on basic cloud services with limited security requirements.

2015-2017: Expansion Phase Government cloud demand accelerated with 35 new vendor authorizations during this period. Adobe Creative Cloud for Government, Box Government Cloud, and Cisco Webex Government received authorization as agencies moved beyond basic infrastructure to productivity and collaboration tools. The Cloud First policy mandate drove this expansion.

2018-2020: Modernization Drive Federal IT modernization initiatives added 42 vendor authorizations including specialized security and development tools. GitHub Enterprise Cloud for Government, Splunk Cloud for Government, and various cybersecurity platforms received FedRAMP approval as agencies focused on DevSecOps and continuous monitoring capabilities.

2021-2022: Security Focus Zero trust architecture requirements and increasing cyber threats led to 28 new authorizations for identity management, endpoint protection, and cloud security vendors. CrowdStrike Falcon Government Community Cloud, Okta Government Cloud, and Zscaler Federal Cloud received authorization during this period.

2023-2024: Current Growth Recent authorizations reflect artificial intelligence, data analytics, and advanced security requirements. Twenty-four vendors received new authorizations in this period, including several AI and machine learning platforms adapted for government use.

Authorization timelines typically require 12-18 months from initial application to final approval. The process includes security assessment, documentation review, and ongoing monitoring requirements that create significant barriers for smaller vendors.

Choosing the Right FedRAMP Vendor for Your Agency's Needs

Selecting appropriate FedRAMP authorized vendors requires matching technical capabilities with security requirements, budget constraints, and mission objectives.

Data Classification Alignment represents the most critical selection factor. Agencies must match data sensitivity levels with vendor authorization levels. Highly sensitive national security data requires High authorization vendors, while basic administrative information may use Low authorization solutions. Mismatched authorization levels create compliance violations and security risks.

Technical Integration Requirements determine vendor compatibility with existing agency systems. Evaluate API capabilities, data export options, single sign-on integration, and directory service compatibility. Vendors with strong government integration experience typically provide better technical support and faster implementation timelines.

Cost Structure Evaluation should include both licensing fees and implementation costs. FedRAMP authorized vendors often charge premium pricing for government versions of commercial software. Calculate total cost of ownership including training, customization, and ongoing support requirements.

Vendor Stability Assessment examines the vendor's government market commitment and financial stability. Established vendors with multiple government contracts provide greater long-term security than newer companies with limited government experience. Review vendor customer references and contract performance history.

Support and Training Capabilities vary significantly among FedRAMP vendors. Government-focused vendors typically provide specialized support teams familiar with federal requirements, while commercial vendors adapted for government may offer limited government-specific expertise.

Compliance Beyond FedRAMP may include additional requirements like FISMA, NIST frameworks, or agency-specific security standards. Verify vendor compliance with all applicable requirements before making final selections.

Start vendor evaluation with a pilot program or proof of concept to validate technical capabilities and user acceptance before committing to enterprise-wide deployments. This approach reduces implementation risks and provides opportunity to negotiate better contract terms based on demonstrated value.